An 18th-century Luberon mas, walked with the restorer who has worked on it for 22 years, in late April 2026. 1.9-meter rubble-stone walls on the south facade, an original lime-plaster ceiling rediscovered in 2009, a 14-month roof reinstatement done off Bâtiments de France approval, and a pool that took three iterations to land. This is a working notebook from a restorer who keeps one.
By The Villas For Kings desk
Villa Vivienne is a working 18th-century mas in the Luberon. The property sits roughly kilometers from the nearest village, in the Vaucluse, on a parcel of roughly hectares that includes an olive grove, a working herb garden, and a stone-walled vegetable plot that supplies the villa kitchen during the rental season. The villa contains bedrooms across two principal floors and a converted attic. The mas has been continuously occupied since approximately 1772.
The villa’s restorer (the person, not the company) has worked on the building for 22 years. He arrived in 2004 to inspect a section of failing roof and has, in his telling, “not yet finished the building.” That sentence is the restorer’s working principle. A working principle that is, in our reading, the single most useful one a Provence villa buyer can apply: the mas is a 250-year-old structure, the restoration is a multi-decade program, and the buyer is renting a snapshot inside that program. The snapshot looks the way it does because of the decisions made before the current owner arrived, and the decisions the restorer has made since.
We spent four hours with him in late April 2026. He keeps a notebook. He let us read it. The observations below are from his notebook, our walkthrough, and a brief follow-up conversation with the villa’s current rental agent. The agent declined to be named for this piece, which is a condition we accept.
The defining structural feature of Villa Vivienne is the wall thickness on the south facade: 1.9 meters of rubble stone bound in lime mortar, the standard 18th-century Luberon construction. The wall, the restorer told us, was built by a local mason whose family name still appears on three of the village’s headstones. The construction date, on the dossier the restorer recovered from the local archive, is 1774.
The wall is the reason the master bedroom on the south side of the property runs at 22 to 23 degrees Celsius on a 36-degree-Celsius August afternoon, with the windows closed and no air conditioning. The wall mass absorbs heat through the day and releases it back into the room overnight, on a 12-hour cycle, which is the principle that 18th-century Provence masons engineered into every south-facing rural building. A 200-millimeter contemporary concrete wall does not perform this function. A 1.9-meter rubble wall does.
The restorer is opinionated about this. He has rejected three offers from the current owner’s family to install air conditioning on the south facade. His position, recorded in his notebook on three separate dates between 2015 and 2024, is that air conditioning destroys the wall’s natural cycle by holding the interior at a constant temperature, which means the wall heats during the day and never sheds its heat back into the room overnight, which means the property loses the asset it was built to be. We have audited Provence properties that retrofitted air conditioning into 1.9-meter walls. The energy bills are roughly four times the unconditioned baseline, and the comfort gain is, at best, marginal.
The first major project of the restorer’s current tenure was the roof. The roof he inherited, in 2008, was a patchwork of three different refurbishments done across the 20th century, none of which had been registered with Bâtiments de France. The structural timbers were intact. The roof tiles were a mix of original 18th-century Roman tile and 1970s machine-pressed replacement. The waterproofing was the 1970s replacement.
The reinstatement program ran from May 2009 to July 2010, fourteen months in total. The first six months were spent assembling the Bâtiments de France dossier. The middle six months were the roof itself: full strip, structural assessment of every rafter, replacement of compromised rafters, reinstatement with Roman tile sourced from a in the Var, and re-bedding in lime mortar to match the original construction. The last two months were the snagging and the heritage authority inspection.
The cost, the restorer told us, was €. The property has not had a roof issue since. The maintenance log records two inspections per year. The 50-year service projection, in the restorer’s notebook, expires in 2059.
What we would not change. The decision, taken by the current owner’s family in 2009, to do the roof first and to do it on full Bâtiments de France approval. Half of the Provence properties we have audited went the other way. Half of those have, since, had a permit issue that complicated a sale or a refinancing.
The pool is, in the restorer’s telling, the part of the property that took longest to get right. The original 1985 pool was a kidney-shaped concrete shell with a tile finish, sited 4 meters off the south terrace, with a heating system that ran on diesel. The first iteration of the restoration, completed in 2012, replaced the tile with a Pentelic-stone finish and added a heat pump. The second iteration, in 2017, replaced the kidney shape with a 14-meter by 5-meter rectangle and shifted the pool 8 meters further south to clear the line of sight from the south terrace. The third iteration, completed in 2023, added a saltwater filtration system, a 26-square-meter pool house at the southwest corner, and a 28-meter pergola along the east edge.
Three iterations. Twenty years from start to finish. The restorer’s view, in his notebook, is that the pool is the part of a Provence property that buyers most often get wrong on the first try. The geometry, the siting, the filtration, the heating, the pergola, the pool house, the deck material, the depth, the lighting: each is a decision a typical owner makes once. Each is a decision that, on Villa Vivienne, took three attempts.
What we would change. The pool depth steps from 1.0 meters at the shallow end to 1.5 meters at the deep end. We would specify 1.4 to 1.9 meters for a property at this rate band. The shallow 1.0-meter end is fine for non-swimmers but limits use by lap swimmers. The retrofit would require draining the pool and re-pouring, which is roughly € of work. The restorer agrees. It is on the family’s 2028 capital plan.
In November 2009, while the roof reinstatement was underway, the restorer’s team removed a ceiling panel that had been installed in the principal salon in the late 1960s. Behind the panel was the original lime-plaster ceiling, dated to the 1774 build, with a hand-painted floral motif at the four corners and a central rose around the original brass chandelier mount. The plaster was intact. The motif had survived. The 1960s ceiling had, in the restorer’s phrase, “simply preserved what it covered.”
The discovery is the kind of moment a restorer’s 22-year tenure produces. It does not appear in the listing copy. It is mentioned, briefly, in the welcome book the rental agent leaves on the central table. It is the part of the property that earns a guest’s attention on the second day, when the light through the south windows catches the rose at the right angle.
The salon is not air-conditioned. The 1.9-meter wall and the lime-plaster ceiling, working together, produce an interior temperature that runs at 23 to 24 degrees Celsius on a 36-degree afternoon. The room is unusable for two hours during the hottest part of the day. It is the most comfortable interior space in the Luberon at every other hour.
The villa lets through at a 2026 peak-week rate of roughly € in July and August, with shoulder rates in May, June, and September running roughly 60 percent of peak. The property closes from November 1 through April 15, which is the right operational decision for a Luberon property at the property’s elevation. Listings that promise late-October Luberon weeks are over-promising on weather and staff, as we noted in Villa Le Mas.
What the rate includes: the villa, a daily housekeeping team, breakfast (a contracted Provence breakfast supplier), a pool attendant, a gardener, wifi at Mbps, and the standard transfer from Avignon TGV (45 minutes by car). What it does not include: a private chef, the optional cook (which the rental agent can arrange at roughly € per day plus groceries), the wine tastings at named estates (the agent maintains a roster of producers within a 30-minute drive), and the hot-air balloon at sunrise above the Luberon, which is the regional excursion that the agent recommends.
The rate sits within the upper third of the Luberon rate band in 2026. We cross-reference the Provence rate band against our cost anatomy and the regional Provence destination guide.
The restorer’s notebook has a recurring entry across the 22 years. The entry is some version of the same observation: buyers arrive on day one expecting the property to feel like a hotel, find that it does not, and spend the first 24 hours adjusting. The mas is not a hotel. The mas is a working agricultural building that has been adapted, on a multi-decade timetable, to rental use. The internet is not hotel-grade. The bathroom plumbing is not hotel-grade. The cell coverage on the parcel is not hotel-grade. The interior temperature swings, by design, with the day.
The mistake buyers keep making is to book the mas expecting a hotel experience and discover, on day one, that the mas is a different proposition. The restorer’s recommendation, recorded in his notebook on November 14, 2017, after a guest complaint his agency had logged that morning: “Send the pre-arrival brief earlier. Set the expectation. The mas is not a Four Seasons. The mas is a 250-year-old farmhouse with a pool and a cook on call. If the buyer wants a Four Seasons, the agent should redirect.”
We agree. The rental agent has, since 2018, updated the pre-arrival brief along these lines. The complaint rate has, in the restorer’s recollection, halved.
Villa Vivienne is for a group of who want an 18th-century Luberon mas with a working restoration program, a deep documentation history, and a property that is the second category of Provence rental: the working historical house. It is for buyers who care about the difference between a 1.9-meter wall and a 200-millimeter contemporary wall. It is for buyers whose primary requirement is the mas experience, not the hotel-style concierge of a recently rebuilt farmhouse.
It is not for buyers who want hotel-grade plumbing, hotel-grade wifi, or hotel-grade cell coverage. It is not for buyers who want the air conditioning that the restorer has refused to install. It is not for buyers who want a beach. The nearest Mediterranean beach is 110 kilometers south. It is not for buyers booking late October, which the property does not offer.
For buyers whose requirements match, Villa Vivienne is the property in the Luberon rate band that we would book before any of the recently rebuilt-to-spec alternatives. The restorer is the asset. The wall mass is the second asset. The 2009 ceiling discovery is the third. The pool depth is the one piece of capital that has not yet caught up.
Our sister sites cover the hotels, restaurants, and bars that work as supplements to a Luberon mas booking.
One email a week. Profile interviews, rate intelligence, and the villas we pass on. Subscribe to the buyer’s brief.
Last updated 2026-04. We have not adjusted our editorial for the commission rate. See how-we-make-money for the full disclosure.